buy custom Syrian Revolution essay

buy custom Syrian Revolution essay It is unclear as to what is the cause of the ongoing Syrian protest. Some argue that is largely due to the unrest in the neighboring Arab world that caught on in Syria. Others claim that the protests began after children in Daraa, a Syrian city, endured torture after reportedly writing anti- It is unclear as to what is the cause of the ongoing Syrian protest. Some argue that is largely due government slogans on the walls of buildings. Protests officially began on February 26, 2011 to present day. It is clear that the protests are not about economic hardships, as protests are countrywide, and transcend any religious, economic, or political difference. Many of the protesters allude to dignity and freedom as their main cause of revolt. It is mindful to observe that the government has been paranoid to the royalties of the subjects (Kamrava 290). They also point out to their cause being a direct result of the corruption that inflicts their nation, as well as a host of other injustices. Th ey believe that the Security Services rule should end and that the Army should fight to protect the citizen's interests, and not of the regime. Others point out that the revolution started in Damascus, when a local shopkeeper endured a beating by a traffic police officer, and people from shops nearby tried to defend him. As more people came to his assistance, a full on protest took place. This highlights the sentiments of many Syrians because they were to endure humiliation no more. The current president of Syria, Bashar al-Assad, ascended into the presidency after his father, Hafez al-Assad, died in the year 2000. The country hopeful that Bashar would address many of the pertinent issues the country experienced. However, despite his ascendancy, many issues remain unsolved. Syria has very low unemployment rates among youth, in comparison to the older citizens (Allain 142). The protests started out unusually small, with many citizens in fear of retaliation by the ruling government. However, Syrians have undergone what many refer to as the breaking the wall of fear. They say that their hearts would not let them sit whilst the government had its way. They overcame the fear that was in their bodies, and chose to follow the feelings that were in their hearts. The Syrian government did not stand and watch. They have disrupted every single protest that has taken place, despite the fact that theyare peaceful. The government comes under intense criticism for unashamedly firing at unarmed protesters. The latest report of violence took place in Homs, where the army opened fire at protesting citizens, killing 55 in the process. A mass funeral took place in Khalidiya, a district in Homs, where most of the killing took place. Most estimates of the current death toll differ in the actual number. Some estimates point out to 10,000 deaths, whilst point to as many as 40,000. What is clear is that the number of people dead is immense. At its lowest, these figures represent 3 times over the number of people who died because of the September 9/11 attacks (Gad 200). Other similar reports highlight the various injustices by the Syrian government. An estimate has it that 500 children have died due to military intervention, with a further 600 currently in Sy rian prisons across the nation. One can only guess what happens in these penitentiaries, with reports claiming torture and human rights violations. One cannot overlook the importance of Hafez al-Assads rule of Syria as having a direct impact on the current state of things. Hafez took control of Syria in 1973 when he was then minister for defense. Initially, Hafez was exceedingly popular for his contribution to the growth of Syria. He was responsible for the introduction of the Syrian constitution and his foreign policies that opened the country up as a trade destination. This move is noted to have increased foreign interrelations with a view of achieving total control of resources such as the oil-region, Kirkuk (Norwegian Refugee CouncilandGlobal IDP Project 171). He is also responsible for many infrastructural initiatives countrywide, like the construction of Thawra dam. After a failed assassination against him, things took a turn for the worse. He is solely responsible for the Tamdor massacre that occurred a day after an attempt on his life. Tamdor prison housed many of Hafezs political enemies. As a show of might, and as a warning to others, his soldiers opened fire at close to 1000 inmates at the prison, killing them. However, he is most popular for his involvement in the Hama massacre, 1982. At the time, the town of Hama housed a rebel group of Sunni Muslims who firmly objected to Hafezs regime. Several insurgents had attacked Hafezs defense forces and killed them. As a result, Hafez, through his brother Rifaat, laidd a siege on the town. Thousands died in the battle, with estimates of 20,000 deaths (Kamrava, 409). This killing alludes to the fact that Bashar is continuing in his fathers legacy of killing anyone that dares defy his government. However, one could point out that Hafez was reacting to actual violence against his government, whilst B ashar kills innocent citizens. A counter argument is that Syrians are fighting because of the disparity in wealth allocation in the country. Reports indicate that 70% of the countrys GDP goes to only 30% of the population. Army and Alawite high-ranking officers are some of the wealthiest in the country. This gives them control of the government and, by extension, the economy. In addition, the Syrian government controls all imports and exports, wholesale and retail trade, operates monopolies, and owns all insurance companies and banks. Therefore, one can deduce that Syrians are also protesting because the rich keep getting richer, while the poor suffer. The rich-poor divide widens in Syria, with many Syrians unable to meet their monthly costs. The bulk of the money earned in Syria goes to extremely few pockets, and the few control most of the crucial facets of the country. Support for Assad and his Regime Contrary to all popular belief, a YouGovSiraj poll in Syria found that 55% of Syrians support the Assad regime in fear of a civil war. They believe that if the protests continue, they could spark a civil war that would lead to carnage, and a retrogression of the economy. However, Assads regime has grown to become unpopular. Experts cite his inability to organize the masses effectively to account for his lack in popular legitimacy (Kamrava 12). Further to this, others believe that Assads actions are justified because citizens should follow the rule of law, and should not be reckless. They believe the protestors are simply lawless, and that they seek to undermine the authority of leaders. In addition, they believe that Assad is under attack because he hails from a minority tribe. They believe this does not err well with the population who believe that the president must hail from a majority tribe, which will truly reflect the people. However, Assad would rule for yet thirty years before his death in June 2001. His son, Bashar Assad succeeded him (Allain 217). Buy custom Syrian Revolution essay

What Was the Open Door Policy in China

What Was the Open Door Policy in China SAT / ACT Prep Online Guides and Tips Looking to learn more about the Open Door Policy? The Open Door Policy was an important policy that affected Asian, European, and US trade for decades and even contributed to the Japanese/American conflict in WWII. What was the Open Door Policy definition? Why and when was the Open Door Policy created? What are the impacts of it? We answer all those questions and more in these open door notes. What Was the Open Door Policy? A brief Open Door Policy definition: The Open Door Policy was a trade agreement between the United States, China, Japan, and several European countries. US Secretary of State John Hay created the Open Door Policy in 1899/1900 in order to allow the US, Japan, and select European countries equal trade access to China, a country that previously had no trade agreements. The Open Door Policy lasted nearly 50 years, until the communist party’s 1949 victory in China’s civil war. In the rest of the guide, we’ll dive deeper into the specifics of the Open Door Policy. We’ll discuss why the Open Door Policy was created, how it was established and maintained, and what its impacts were. Why Was the Open Door Policy Created? Simply put, the United States was worried it was going to lose trading access with China, and it wanted a policy in place to protect its ability to continue trading with the Chinese.In this section, we’ll look more closely as to why the US cared so much about trading with China, and why there were worried their access would be cut off. The Open Door Policy was created during the Age of Imperialism, a period during the late 19th century and early 20th century when European powers, as well as countries like the US and Japan, were attempting to expand their global power through colonialism and territory expansion. China was particularly seen as a lucrative prize, so multiple countries built a large presence there, and they began setting up trading stations and deploying troops to different regions of the country in order to have the best access to China’s trade. The United States got into this game a little late. It wasn’t until after the Spanish American War ended in 1898 that the US began to take a deep interest in China. At the end of the war, the US ended up with a large amount of land in Asia, primarily the Philippine Islands. This newly-acquired land caused the US to look more closely at China, and they saw that trading with China could earn them a lot of money. However, multiple other countries had already realized this and had established large spheres of influence in China. European powers such as Great Britain, the Netherlands, France, and Belgium had well established colonies and influence in Asia and Africa. Japan was also exerting significant power in China. During the first Sino-Japanese War (1894-1895), Japan and China fought for control of Korea. After Japan won the war, it sharply increased its power in both Korea and China. The US’s sphere of influence in China was not nearly as well-established as those of the other foreign powers there, and US President McKinley worried that the other foreign powers would limit the US’s ability to trade with China and potentially block the US from trading with China at all. How Was the Open Door Policy Implemented? In 1898, US President William McKinley announced his desire for a policy that would allow countries equal access to trade with China. In effect, there’d be an â€Å"open door† to Chinese trade, and one country couldn’t close the door to another country.President McKinley was concerned the US would be forced out of the Chinese trade by Japan and other European countries, and he wanted a policy that explicitly protected the US’s right to continue trading with China. As a result, in 1899, US Secretary of State John Hay began circulating diplomatic notes among the major world powers (Great Britain, Germany, France, Italy, Japan, and Russia) at the time to get the Open Door Policy formally approved. Because of his work doing this, Hay is often seen as the author of the Open Door Policy. Hay’s diplomatic notes proposed that all countries should have equal trading access to the entirety of China and those foreign countries must allow Chinese officials to regulate the trade and collect taxes from it.The purpose of Hay’s notes was to grant all the major powers equal access to Chinese trade and reduce the influence of countries that already had an especially large hold in China (such as Japan and Russia) so they couldn’t force other countries (particularly the United States) out of the Chinese market. None of the countries Hay spoke with formally agreed to the Open Door Policy. However, none explicitly opposed it, and the European countries unofficially supported the plan, so Hay announced that an agreement had been reached, and the Open Door Policy became the de facto trade policy in China. In 1921/1922, after challenges to the Open Door Policy by Chinese nationalists as well as Japan (discussed more in the next section), the US attempted to make the Open Door Policy official at the Washington Naval Conference. During the war between China and Japan that began in 1937, the US continued to strenuously support the Open Door Policy and increased embargoes on many commodities to Japan as a result of Japan not following the policy. The Open Door Policy remained in effect until Japan’s defeat in WWII in 1945 and the end of the Chinese civil war in 1949. After these events China began to be recognized as a sovereign state with control over its own trade agreements. What Were the Effects of the Open Door Policy? What did the Open Door Policy do? The Open Door Policy was an important agreement that reflected the imperialist attitude of many global powers at the time and those countries’ intense desire to expand their global reach. The Open Door Policy had three main impacts. Increased Chinese Backlash Against Foreigners The creation of the Open Door Policy increased foreign influence in China, which led to a rise in anti-foreign and anti-colonial sentiment in the country.The backlash against foreigners led to widespread killings of missionaries working in China and an increase in nationalist feelings among the Chinese.The Boxer Rebellion was one of the most important events caused by this anti-foreign movement. The Boxer Rebellion started in 1899, when a Chinese group known as the Society of Righteous and Harmonious Fists (known as â€Å"Boxers† to the English) initiated an uprising against foreign influence.The US, Japan, and several European countries fought back and eventually defeated the Boxers in 1901. Even after the rebellion ended, foreign soldiers continued killing and looting in many villages. The Boxer Rebellion weakened the power of the Chinese ruling dynasty and contributed to the end of Europeans’ attempts to colonize China. Chinese and American Conflict With Japan Even though Japan did not reject the Open Door Policy when it was created, the country challenged and openly violated the policy multiple times, which led to conflict with China and the US.Japan first violated the Open Door Policy when it presented its Twenty-One Demands to China in 1915. During WWI, Japan sent the list to China demanding an expansion of Japanese control in the Chinese region of Manchuria, as well as significantly increased control of the Chinese economy. Japan gained little from the Twenty-One Demands, but sending them caused a deterioration in Japan’s relationship with the US and Great Britain, who resented the challenge to the Open Door Policy.In response to the Twenty-One Demands, China, the United States, Belgium, France, the UK, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, and Portugal attended the Washington Naval Conference in 1922 and signed the Nine-Power Treaty which officially affirmed the Open Door Policy and the sovereignty of China. However, in 1931, Japan violated both the Nine-Power Treaty and the Open Door Policy when they invaded Manchuria, an event known as the Mukden Incident.The Mukden Incident led to Japan establishing a puppet government in Manchuria, becoming diplomatically isolated as other countries condemned its actions, and withdrawing from the League of Nations.The Mukden Incident also led to the second Sino-Japanese War between Japan and China, which lasted from 1937 to 1945. It was the largest Asian war of the 20th century. The US allied with China in the war and strenuously supported the Open Door Policy by increasing embargoes on exports of key commodities to Japan. These embargoes led to heightened tensions between Japan and the US and were one of the causes of Japan bombing Pearl Harbor in 1941 and going to war with the US in WWII. Increased US Interest in East Asia The Open Door Policy was one of the first major steps the US took to expand their influence in East Asia, and it was one of their most important footholds in the area.Once the US realized how lucrative trading with China could be, they pushed hard for the Open Door Policy, which would give them secure access to Chinese trade and expand their influence in the area. This increased influence in East Asia was lucrative for the US, but it also caused them to be drawn into conflicts in the region, such as the Boxer Rebellion and conflicts between Japan and China. The increased American influence in the area and its involvement in the area’s conflicts also led to rising tensions with Japan, which culminated with the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Summary: Open Door Notes What was the Open Door Policy definition? The Open Door Policy was a policy between China, the US, Japan, and several European powers that stated each of those countries should have equal access to Chinese trade.It was created in 1899 by US Secretary of State John Hay and lasted until 1949, when the Chinese civil war ended. Why was the Open Door Policy created? The US had recently gained a foothold in East Asia, and they were afraid they’d be forced out of the Chinese market by countries who had been there longer than them, so they created the policy to ensure they wouldn’t lose their ability to trade with China. Why was the Open Door Policy created? The US had recently gained a foothold in East Asia, and they were afraid they’d be forced out of the Chinese market by countries who had been there longer than them, so they created the policy to ensure they wouldn’t lose their ability to trade with China. What were the impacts of the Open Door Policy? The Open Door Policy’s impacts lasted for decades, and it had three major impacts: Increased Chinese backlash against foreigners Chinese and American conflict with Japan Increased US interest in East Asia What's Next? Writing a research paper for school but not sure what to write about?Our guide to research paper topicshas over 100 topics in ten categories so you can be sure to find the perfect topic for you. Learning about natural logs?We've compiled all the main natural log rules to make it easy for you to learn and understand them. Have trouble understanding what dynamic equilibrium is?We break this sometimes tricky concept down so it's easy to understand in our complete guide to dynamic equilibrium.